Tag: Repression of Women

  • How Digital Spaces Reinforce Gender Violence in Saudi Arabia

    How Digital Spaces Reinforce Gender Violence in Saudi Arabia

    Since 2019, Saudi Arabia has lifted many of the restrictions imposed on women under the male guardianship system, with Crown Prince MBS praising these measures as evidence of the kingdom’s progress towards gender equality. Among other reforms, women over 21 were granted the right to obtain passports and travel without a male guardian’s permission. Yet in practice, the reality of women’s autonomy in Saudi Arabia remains far more complex than any legislative amendment might suggest. Women remain constrained by enduring social prejudice and discriminatory attitudes, manifesting increasingly behind a layer of digital control. Saudi Arabia’s online spaces continue to reproduce patriarchal hierarchies, enabling online harassment and restrictions that limit women’s freedoms in the virtual sphere.

    The rise of an interconnected digital community on the internet has made Saudi women more visible and active in public discourse, something that was largely uncommon and impossible in the past. Yet women are heavily pressured and discouraged from engaging in online activism, their visibility often being perceived as a threat. The online presence of high-profile female activists has triggered significant levels of digital violence against women, including online verbal abuse, frequent unsolicited contact, and even stalking. According to recent studies, one in four women using internet platforms in Saudi Arabia has experienced at least one form of digital violence. This shows how, with formal guardianship laws now partially dismantled, discrimination has largely shifted into digital spaces, where it continues to reinforce offline social hierarchies.

    One of the most common tactics employed against women activists is the use of so-called “electronic armies”, composed of networks of coordinated social media users who assume false identities and conduct online hate campaigns to intimidate peaceful dissidents. Many of these actors operate as unofficial agents of the Saudi government. These groups communicate through encrypted platforms such as Telegram and Whatsapp, where they receive lists of targets to harass, meeting daily quotas of abusive messages and tweets. The impact of these digital attacks extends beyond the digital sphere, often escalating into physical harm.

    Saudi Arabia’s digital repression of women is not only domestic. It also targets exiled activists as part of a transnational network of repression that undermines digital rights and freedom of expression. According to a Freedom House report, women have been disproportionately targeted in the kingdom’s transnational campaigns in comparison to their male counterparts. In fact, since MBS’s rise to power, the government’s intensified gender-based repression coincided with a sharp increase in the number of Saudi women seeking asylum abroad. Yet, activists abroad remain subject to punitive measures, with Saudi authorities reportedly using spyware and online harassment to monitor and intimidate women.

    In light of this ongoing persecution, the government’s promotion of Digital Saudi 2030, a central part of the Vision 2030 initiative, appears deeply contradictory and deceiving. There is a concerning discrepancy between Saudi Arabia’s rhetoric of digital modernization and its continued use of censorship, surveillance and repression against activists. For example, the enactment of the Personal Status Law in 2022 was framed as a major reform in the struggle against gender discrimination. While the government celebrates the law, experts argue that it codifies several discriminatory practices, including the requirement for women to obtain a guardian’s consent to marry. Women’s rights activists in Saudi Arabia, who had long advocated for a codified Personal Status Law, were excluded from the drafting process and silenced when they sought to comment publicly on it. Many faced arbitrary arrest, detention, and travel bans, demonstrating the kingdom’s intolerance toward women’s civic participation. 

    A 2024 World Bank report on Women, Business, and the Law suggests a lack of mechanisms to ensure the effective implementation of laws relating to women’s rights in Saudi Arabia. This stems from insufficient supportive frameworks and government-led services that ensure the protection of women’s rights in practice. The findings reveal a disconnect between women’s growing participation in the digital economy and their continued vulnerability online. To address this gap, Saudi Arabia must move beyond its legislative promises and implement practical measures to protect women in digital spaces.
    Despite formal legal reforms, Saudi women continue to face higher risks of violence in digital spaces, highlighting how patriarchal norms remain deeply entrenched in society. Women who engage online are vulnerable to harassment and targeted repression by both state authorities and members of society. DR4G demands that the Saudi government implements comprehensive protections tailored to the specific forms of digital violence that women face. This must include safety measures and accessible resources to mitigate online harassment, as well as transparent investigations into violations by authorities. Only by aligning legislative reform with practical frameworks can women be protected from digital violations to make their voices heard in public discourse.

  • Silenced Online: Loujain al-Hathloul and the Weaponization of Cybercrime Laws in Saudi Arabia

    Silenced Online: Loujain al-Hathloul and the Weaponization of Cybercrime Laws in Saudi Arabia

    Loujain al-Hathloul: Digital Dissent, Cybercrime Laws, and the Struggle for Women’s Rights in Saudi Arabia​

    Loujain al-Hathloul, a prominent Saudi women’s rights activist, has become a symbol of resistance against oppressive laws and the misuse of cybercrime legislation in Saudi Arabia. Her activism, particularly her campaign for women’s right to drive and her opposition to the male guardianship system, led to her arrest in May 2018. She was subsequently sentenced to five years and eight months in prison under Saudi Arabia’s counterterrorism and cybercrime laws, with a portion of the sentence suspended.

    Al-Hathloul’s activism began in 2013 when she publicly defied the ban on women driving in Saudi Arabia. Her efforts extended beyond driving; she also campaigned against the male guardianship system, which requires women to obtain permission from a male relative to travel, marry, or work. Her bold actions and use of social media platforms to advocate for women’s rights brought international attention to the systemic gender inequalities in the Kingdom.​

    Arrest and Charges Under Cybercrime Laws

    In May 2018, just weeks before the ban on women driving was lifted, al-Hathloul was arrested along with other activists. She was charged with “spying with foreign parties” and “conspiring against the Kingdom,” accusations that human rights organizations argue were based on vague and broadly defined laws . Her case was transferred to the Specialized Criminal Court, which handles terrorism and national security cases, raising concerns about the criminalization of peaceful activism.​

    Imprisonment and Allegations of Torture

    During her imprisonment, al-Hathloul reported experiencing torture and sexual assault, allegations that were dismissed by the court. Her family stated that she was offered release in exchange for denying these claims, which she refused. To support her rehabilitation, the court suspended part of her sentence, provided she did not commit another offense within the next three years.

    Release and Continued Restrictions

    In February 2021, after serving over one thousand days in prison, al-Hathloul was released. However, her freedom remains restricted; she is under probation, subject to a travel ban, and prohibited from speaking about her detention. Her family called for “real justice” and plans to legally challenge the travel ban imposed on her.

    Cybercrime Laws as Tools of Repression

    Al-Hathloul’s case highlights how cybercrime legislation can be employed to suppress dissenting voices and criminalize online activism. The charges against her included using the internet to disrupt public order, reflecting a broader trend of using cybercrime laws to target activists. This misuse of legislation undermines freedom of expression and the right to peaceful protest.​

    International Response and Ongoing Advocacy

    Al-Hathloul’s case has drawn international attention, with human rights organizations condemning her treatment and the misuse of cybercrime laws to silence activists. Amnesty International and other groups have called for accountability for those responsible for her torture and for all punitive measures against her to be lifted. Her resilience continues to inspire activists worldwide, highlighting the need for legal reforms that protect, rather than punish, digital activism.​

    Concluding Statements: 

    Al-Hathloul’s story is a testament to the courage of individuals who stand up against oppressive systems. Her continued advocacy, despite the risks and restrictions, serves as a powerful source of hope and inspiration for those fighting for human rights and freedom of expression in the digital age.​

    However, her struggles are far from over. The lingering restrictions on her freedom, including the travel ban and probation, are clear reminders of how states can continue to exert control over activists long after their release. Her case illustrates the dangerous broadness of cybercrime laws in Saudi Arabia, which have been weaponized to punish peaceful dissent and silence calls for reform under the pretext of national security and public order.

    Digital Rights 4 Gulf urges the international community to intensify pressure on Saudi authorities to lift all restrictions against Loujain al-Hathloul and to hold those responsible for her mistreatment accountable. We call for urgent reforms to cybercrime laws across the Gulf to ensure they are not used as tools of repression but are aligned with international human rights standards. Protecting digital freedoms is not only about preserving online expression, it is about defending the very right to speak, to challenge, and to demand justice.

  • Ebtisam Al-Saegh: A Case Study of the Risks Against Women in Bahrain’s Digital Repression

    Ebtisam Al-Saegh: A Case Study of the Risks Against Women in Bahrain’s Digital Repression

    When speaking out for justice becomes dangerous, women like Ebtisam Al-Saegh offer examples of the continuous taument that activists face. A prominent Bahraini human rights and women’s rights activist, Al-Saegh represents the compounded risks female activists face in the digital age, particularly in authoritarian states like Bahrain. Her experience serves as a chilling  example of how regimes deploy advanced digital surveillance tools to suppress dissent while exposing women activists to heightened risks due to both their advocacy and gender.

    Al-Saegh’s unwavering commitment to defending the rights of women and political prisoners in Bahrain has made her a frequent target of state repression. Before her sentencing in May 2017, she was subjected to brutal torture, including sexual assault, at the hands of Bahrain’s National Security Service.

    Although released pending trial, the abuses against her did not stop there. Investigations by Middle East Eye suggest she became a target of Pegasus spyware, a powerful surveillance tool developed by the Israeli NSO Group, allowing Bahraini authorities to infiltrate her phone. This spyware granted access to her private communications, location data, and even live conversations, creating an invasive net around her activities. Reports indicate her iPhone was hacked at least eight times between August and November 2019.

    Al-Saegh described the fear and violation she felt:

    “I now fear the worst and worry that the Bahrain government will be able to exploit my personal documents and family photos.”

    But surveillance was only part of the campaign against her. The spyware attack has led to fear that her personal information could be held against her. The repercussions extended beyond her personal safety, affecting her family, social standing, and mental well-being, further intensifying the psychological toll of such targeted oppression. It is clear that this is a direct act of violence against human rights activists. 

    Al-Saegh’s case is not an isolated one; it reflects a broader pattern of repression against women human rights defenders in Bahrain. Female activists often face gender-based violence, including digital harassment, sexual intimidation, and defamation, all designed to erode their credibility and deter their activism. This creates an additional layer of asymmetry due to the fact that these acts exacerbate pre existing vulnerabilities that women face. These tactics not only suppress their voices but also reinforce societal norms that seek to limit women’s inclusion and participation  in public and political life.

    Her treatment, both in custody and after, exemplifies the compounding impact of authoritarian control and gender-based oppression in Bahrain’s digital landscape. As an outspoken critic of the regime and a woman activist, she represents a dual threat to the state, making her a prime target of both political and gendered repression.

    Americans for Democracy & Human Rights in Bahrain urges the Bahraini government to cease its use of digital repression tools like Pegasus, end the harassment and persecution of women activists, and ensure the protection of fundamental freedoms. The international community must hold the Bahraini government accountable for its systematic violations of human rights, particularly in its efforts to target women who challenge the regime. Ensuring the safety and freedom of expression for women activists is not only a matter of justice but also a crucial step in combating digital authoritarianism in the 21st century.

  • Silencing Dissent: The Case of Loujain Al Hathloul and Digital Violence in Saudi Arabia

    Silencing Dissent: The Case of Loujain Al Hathloul and Digital Violence in Saudi Arabia

    In the realm of human rights advocacy, few cases resonate as loudly as that of Loujain Al Hathloul, a leading women’s rights advocate from Saudi Arabia. Her story serves as a major instance of the widespread phenomenon of digital violence against women in the kingdom. Despite her brave efforts to challenge societal norms, Al Hathloul became a target of online abuse, highlighting the alarming use of digital platforms to suppress dissent and silence women’s voices, with the outcome of exacerbating the gender digital divide. In 2014, she defied the ban on women driving by attempting to cross the border from the United Arab Emirates into Saudi Arabia with her car, a courageous act that led to her arrest and imprisonment for 73 days. However, Al Hathloul’s activism did not end with her release. Instead, she continued to speak out against the injustices faced by women in Saudi Arabia, leveraging social media as a powerful tool for advocacy.

    One of the most insidious tactics employed against Al Hathloul was the use of digital violence. In her case, it manifested in the form of hacking her social media accounts, spreading false information about her online, and even impersonating her family members to undermine her credibility. The challenges faced by Loujain Al Hathloul resonate with those encountered by other women activists in Saudi Arabia, including Samar Badawi and Nassima Al-Sada. Samar Badawi, human rights defender, has long provoked Saudi authorities with her advocacy for women’s rights and political prisoners. Her 2018 arrest sparked global outrage and subjected her to digital harassment and defamation campaigns, aimed at discrediting her and diminishing her activism. Similarly, Nassima Al-Sada has faced relentless persecution for her advocacy efforts for women’s rights. Arrested in 2018 for her peaceful work, including campaigning against the male guardianship system, Al-Sada, like Al Hathloul and Badawi, has been subjected to digital violence, including hacking attempts and online harassment, in an effort to silence her and dissuade others from joining her cause.

    The intent behind digital violence against women’s right defenders is clear: to intimidate, discredit, and ultimately silence individuals who dare to speak out against the status quo. Attacks can manifest in various forms, including defamation campaigns, identity theft, and the creation of fraudulent accounts using women’s personal information. For instance, the Gulf Centre for Human Rights expressed alarm in an October 2019 statement regarding the use of “deepfake” technology targeting women human rights advocates through the manipulation of images, audio, video, and text, posing a serious threat to their safety. In the Arab States, nearly half of the women who suffered online violence in 2021 said to have experienced it at least once in their life, while the other half has been a victim of online harassment more than once. It is not a coincidence that Arab States have one of the widest gender divides as reported by the International Telecommunication Union in 2021, with 56% of women having online access compared to 68% of men. Digital violence exacerbates this gap by further marginalizing women in online spaces. When women are subjected to harassment, intimidation, and defamation online, it not only silences their voices but also creates a hostile environment that discourages their participation. Fear of online abuse can lead women to self-censor or withdraw from digital platforms altogether, limiting their access to information, resources and opportunities for skill development.

    By targeting Al Hathloul’s online exposure, the Saudi authorities sought to not only undermine her activism but also to send a warning message to others who might consider following in her footsteps. Authoritarian regimes primarily use restrictions on information dissemination to mitigate possible harm when faced with novel and unexpected challenges to the system and its core values. The most efficient tool at the disposal of authoritarian governments to prevent the spread of undesirable information is control over the media through a large market share of state-owned outlets that restricts access for independent media and suppresses social minorities’ voices. In this case, the reach of these attacks extended even beyond the borders of Saudi Arabia, reaching a global audience and implicating not just the Saudi government but also the tech companies that inadvertently facilitated these abuses.

    Al Hathloul’s case, much like Badawi’s and Al-Sada’s and many other women’s rights activists, serves to highlight the urgent need for greater protections against digital violence. Tech companies must be held accountable for safeguarding the online spaces they provide, ensuring that they are not complicit in the suppression of human rights. Moreover, governments and international organizations must take decisive action to hold perpetrators of digital violence accountable and ensure that those who dare to speak truth to power are protected from harm. Al Hathloul’s commitment to justice and equality is a powerful reminder of the importance of standing firm against digital violence and advancing human rights for all, both online and offline.

    Originally posted at ECDHR

  • A Community Under Watch: The targeting of women activists using Pegasus Spyware in Bahrain

    A Community Under Watch: The targeting of women activists using Pegasus Spyware in Bahrain

    Bahrain’s government has increasingly weaponized digital technology to suppress dissent and maintain its authoritarian control. Through pervasive surveillance, online censorship, and targeted monitoring, authorities stifle freedom of expression and political mobilization, particularly targeting women activists. Reports from organizations such as Amnesty International and Citizen Lab reveal that Pegasus spyware, developed by the NSO Group, has been deployed against women human rights defenders, exposing a troubling pattern of gendered digital repression.

    Pegasus spyware infiltrates mobile devices, granting access to calls, messages, contacts, and even microphones. Activists targeted by this spyware face profound violations of privacy and heightened risks to their safety. For instance, Bahraini human rights activist Ebtisam Al-Saegh reportedly experienced harassment after her phone was infected with Pegasus, allowing authorities to monitor her private communications and isolate her from support networks. Such surveillance deepens systemic challenges, exposing women to social ostracization, legal threats, and reputational harm in conservative societies. In this particular case, Ebtisam Al-Saegh  was wrongfully charged with terrorism under “using human rights work as a cover to communicate and cooperate with Al Karama Foundation to provide them with information and fake news about the situation in Bahrain to undermine its status abroad” after speaking out about the atrocities committed against her and other Bharani women. 

    Such instances highlight the risk of surveillance and its harmful effects, potentially discouraging women and other activists from engaging in political advocacy or organizing protests. This hyper-surveillance fosters distrust within activist networks, eroding the solidarity necessary for effective collective action. Women often bear additional societal pressures, as breaches of their private data can lead to severe public shaming, perpetuating cultural norms that suppress their participation in public and political life.

    The psychological impact of constant monitoring is equally as unkind. Activists perceive a persistent sense of unease and loss of autonomy, as the fear of penalties prevents them from freely expressing themselves or engaging in open discourse. Women, in particular, face unique challenges due to their central roles in family communication networks. Surveillance not only compromises their activism but also endangers their loved ones, forcing many to withdraw from advocacy efforts to shield their families from harm.

    In this respect, Bahrain’s surveillance regime exemplifies how technology is wielded to deepen existing gender inequalities and silence marginalized voices. For women activists, the digital repression compounds societal constraints, isolating them from their communities and restricting their ability to participate in movements for justice and equality.

    Countering such abuses requires robust international pressure and grassroots resilience. ADHRB Americans for Democracy & Human Rights in Bahrain call  on the Bahraini government to end its digital authoritarian practices and uphold its human rights obligations. This includes amending vague cybercrime laws that criminalize dissent, releasing individuals imprisoned for expressing their opinions, and ensuring the protection of privacy and freedom of expression for all citizens. As digital tools evolve, safeguarding civil liberties, especially for vulnerable groups, must remain a priority in the fight against authoritarianism.