Tag: Transational Repression

  • The Role of the Diaspora in Advocating for Digital Rights in the Gulf

    The Role of the Diaspora in Advocating for Digital Rights in the Gulf

    As Gulf states deploy increasingly sophisticated tools of digital control, ranging from surveillance spyware to content censorship, the diaspora has become a vital voice in the global movement for digital rights. Detached from many of the immediate risks faced by dissidents inside the region, Gulf diaspora communities have used their transnational positions to spotlight abuses, challenge authoritarian narratives, and push for international accountability. 

    Who Makes Up the Gulf Diaspora?

    The Gulf diaspora consists of exiled activists, political dissidents, journalists, academics, students, and ordinary citizens who fled their home countries due to persecution, legal threats, or shrinking civic space. Many reside in Europe, North America, and Southeast Asia, where they benefit from stronger protections for freedom of expression and digital security. Others are part of longstanding migrant communities shaped by generational exile, statelessness (such as the Bidun community), or sectarian marginalization, particularly among Shia populations in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia.

    For many, exile is not just a personal safety strategy; it becomes a political position. Their lived experience of repression fuels a commitment to advocacy, transparency, and reform. These communities form online networks, NGOs, think tanks, and media platforms to document digital rights violations and engage international audiences.

    Digital Activism Beyond Borders

    While the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) affirms freedom of expression and the right to privacy, these rights are routinely violated in the Gulf. Governments use broadly defined cybercrime laws to criminalize dissent and silence critics. For example, the United Arab Emirates’ Cybercrime Law (Federal Decree-Law No. 34 of 2021) penalizes online content that “harms the reputation of the state,” a vague standard frequently used to imprison activists and journalists.

    Diaspora advocates, operating beyond these borders, become the last line of free expression for many back home. Whether through long-form investigative journalism, Twitter threads, Instagram reels, or encrypted messaging apps, they work to document abuses and preserve the voices of those silenced inside the region.

    Organizations such as ALQST for Human Rights, founded by Saudi dissidents in exile, regularly publish reports on arrests, censorship, and surveillance. The Gulf Centre for Human Rights (GCHR) brings together activists from across the region to coordinate advocacy campaigns, train digital defenders, and engage international institutions.

    Case in Point: The Surveillance of Jamal Khashoggi

    An alarming case that we have previously mentioned throughout our research into the internet risks experienced by Gulf diaspora members was the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi,  who was a U.S. resident. Investigations revealed that Pegasus spyware was used to surveil people close to him, including his fiancée and fellow dissidents. Citizen Lab and Amnesty International later confirmed that Gulf governments used this tool to target journalists, lawyers, and human rights defenders living in exile.

    This kind of transnational digital authoritarianism; where regimes export repression via digital tools is an increasingly common tactic. In addition, a 2022 Freedom House report found that Gulf countries are among the most active in digitally targeting their diasporas abroad, including through online harassment, hacking, spyware, and threats to family members.

    How the Diaspora Organizes and Mobilizes

    Despite these threats, the Gulf diaspora has grown into a well-networked digital advocacy ecosystem:

    • Independent Media: Outlets like MENA Rights Group, Lualua TV, and Daraj amplify the perspectives of exiled journalists and whistleblowers.
    • Legal Advocacy: Groups such as BIRD (Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy) conduct strategic litigation and file complaints with UN bodies and European courts against spyware vendors and abusive states.
    • Online Campaigns: Diaspora-led initiatives such as #FreeAhmedMansoor, #JusticeForKhashoggi, and campaigns against arms exports to Gulf states have gained global traction on social media.
    • Academic Engagement: Exiled scholars collaborate with universities and think tanks to produce policy research, op-eds, and panel discussions on digital repression in the Gulf.

    The diaspora’s ability to speak truth to power, without facing immediate imprisonment, makes them indispensable to the global digital rights movement.

    Challenges and Opportunities

    Despite their resilience, diaspora activists continue to face significant risks. Many experience digital harassment, phishing attacks, or surveillance attempts. Others are doxxed or defamed by state-aligned media. Some report coercion or retaliation against relatives still living in the Gulf.

    Yet their advocacy has already led to tangible outcomes. In 2022, the European Parliament called for a ban on spyware exports like Pegasus, citing the targeting of Gulf diaspora members. UN experts have urged stronger controls on the surveillance industry and condemned spying on human rights defenders.

    To better support the diaspora’s advocacy, the international community must strengthen legal protections for exiled human rights defenders and create mechanisms to hold both states and private actors accountable. This includes:

    • Expanding the scope of international agreements like the Budapest Convention to include safeguards against state-sponsored cyber repression;
    • Establishing international export controls on spyware, modeled on the Wassenaar Arrangement;
    • Providing digital security training and legal assistance to diaspora activists targeted by transnational threats.

    The diaspora’s role is not just reactive but visionary. By preserving spaces for free expression, exposing abuses, and pushing for reform, they are helping to shape a digital future rooted in transparency and human dignity. As digital authoritarianism becomes increasingly transnational, the resistance to it must also transcend borders. The Gulf diaspora stands at the frontline of this struggle, offering a blueprint for collective action and international solidarity.

  • Transnational repression: a tool that extends authoritarian government’s capacity for repression

    Transnational repression: a tool that extends authoritarian government’s capacity for repression

    Perhaps not-so-well-known, transnational repression constitutes a threat to human rights that has been going on for decades. The phenomenon, which entails governments reaching beyond their borders to silence or deter dissent by committing human rights abuses against their nationals or former nationals, has been extensively documented by Human Rights Watch. The 2018 murder and dismemberment of journalist Jamal Khashoggi by Saudi Arabia brought this issue to popular awareness.

    Alongside killings, the methods of transnational repression include unlawful removals (expulsions, extraditions, and deportations), abductions and forced disappearances, targeting of relatives, abuse of consular services, and digital transnational repression. Government critics, dissidents, human rights defenders, civil society activists, journalists, opposition party members, and their families and friends are the main victims of this type of repression. In addition, women as a group are specially targeted when attempting to flee their families or their government´s restrictive laws. Several cases reported in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain exemplify this burdensome reality.

    In January 2022, after the Bahraini authorities issued a Red Notice through the International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol), Ahmed Jaffer Muhammad, a Bahraini critic of the government, was extradited from Serbia, the country he had previously fled after suffering torture and ill-treatment when detained in Bahrain. Serbia did so while ignoring an order from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) pending more information on the risks of mistreatment. Now, the critic is serving life in prison in Bahrain following allegations that he was tortured while in custody.

    Saudi women are among those who have tried to flee their families to escape the rules of a strict male guardianship system that denies them the autonomy to make decisions about their own lives. Families of these women, supported by Saudi authorities, had tried to bring them back, sometimes successfully. In April 2017, Dina Ali Lasloom aimed to flee their family by flying to Australia, but when transiting in Manila, she was prevented from boarding the plane to her final destination. Apparently, two airline security officials and two men -later confirmed as Lasloom’s uncles- were seen carrying her with duct tape on her mouth, feet, and hands. According to Bloomberg, after being sent back to Saudi Arabia, Lasloom was held without charge under protective custody in a detention facility for women under 30 years until the authorities could resolve the case. In January 2019, Rahaf Mohammed al-Qunun also attempted to flee her family by traveling to Australia. During a connection in Thailand, however, she was stopped by the Thai authorities, who planned to put her on a flight back home. Global pressure on the Asian country was essential to allow her to travel to Canada, where she finally received asylum.

    It is also worth emphasizing the government’s punishment of the families of individuals who abandon the country following persecution. In this sense, there are instances where relatives have been harassed, threatened, arbitrarily arrested, banned from traveling abroad, and even killed. In Bahrain, authorities have targeted the wife, son, and brother and mother-in-law of the founder of the Bahrain Institute for Human Rights and Democracy –Sayed al-Wadaei-, in exile in the UK. The families of Omar Abdulaziz, a Saudi dissident based in Canada, and of Saad Al-Jabri, a former top Saudi intelligence official, suffered similar repression in Saudi Arabia.

    Although mostly understood as referring to authoritarian governments, cases of transnational repression have also been assisted by democratic administrations, as seen in Serbia’s involvement in the extradition of a Bahraini dissident. Furthermore, this case also highlights governments’ misuse of Interpol’s red notices to target human rights activists abroad. Red notices, formal requests of the National Central Bureaus (NCBs) in the organization, are issued to locate wanted individuals for detention, arrest, or restriction of movement. When put to the wrong use, these notices represent a major concern, especially in countries with authoritarian regimes. In the Arab Gulf region, for example, this has become a political strategy used by governments to suppress dissent and target political opponents. With this, a need for increased vigilance and reform within Interpol’s operational framework has emerged.

    Sometimes downplayed, the phenomenon of transnational repression should be as disturbing as the efforts of some governments to silence dissent or target human rights defenders at home. Also, this practice demands putting pressure on compliant democratic countries, which should be easier to hold accountable. However, more scrutiny must be exerted around this reality to accomplish this endeavor.

    Written By ADHRB INTERN.